Word and Culture
A few words are necessary concerning
what I mean by ‘culture.’ I do not
intend to use the term culture in the
sense of ‘high culture,’ i.e., the appreciation
of music, literature, the arts, and so
on. Rather, I intend to use it in the sense
of whatever a person must know in order
to function in a particular society.
Various aspects/approaches of
word and culture
1. Whorf
2. Kindship
3. Color
4. Taxonomies
5. Prototypes
6. Taboo words and Euphemism
Kindship
One interesting way in which
people use language in daily living is to refer to various kinds of kin. It is
not surprising, therefore, that there is a considerable literature on kinship
terminology, describing how people in various parts of the world refer to
relatives by blood (or descent) and marriage Kinship systems are a
universal feature of languages, because
kinship is so important t in social organisation. Some systems are much richer
than others, but all make use of such factors
as gender, age, generation, blood, and
marriage in their organization One of the attractions that kinship systems have
for investigators is that these factors are fairly readily ascertainable.
Taxonimoes
Analyses into taxonomies s and
components are useful in that they help us to organize data in ways that appear
to indicate how speakers use their language to organize the world around them The
analyses show how systematic
much of that behavior is and do
so in a rather surprising way. This is talk about hierarchy in a situation, for
example like in animal.
Color
Our world is a world of color
but the amount of color varies from place to place and time to time. A January
flight from Acapulco, Mexico, to Toronto, Canada, takes one from a sun-drenched array of colors to a gray drabness. Except to
those blinded to it, color is all around
but it is not everywhere treated in the same way The terms people use to
describe color give us another means of exploring the relationships between
different languages and cultures. The color spectrum is a physical continuum
showing no breaks at all. All languages make use of basic color terms. A basic
color term must be a single word, e.g., blue or yellow, not some combination of
words, e.g., light blue or pale yellow. Nor must it be the obvious sub-division
of some higher-order term, as both crimson and scarlet are of red. It must have
quite general use; i.e., it must not be applied only to a very narrow range of
objects, as, for example, blond is applied in English almost exclusively to the
color of hair and wood. Also, the term must not be highly restricted in the
sense that it is used by only a specific sub-set of speakers, such as interior
decorators or fashion writers.
Prototypes
a prototype-based concept can
be learned on the basis of a very small number of instances – perhaps a single
one – and without any kind of formal definition, whereas a feature-based
definition would be very much harder to learn since a much larger number of
cases, plus a number of non-cases, would be needed before the learner could
work out which features were necessary and which were not. Moreover, such a
view allows for a more flexible approach to understanding how people actually
use language. In that usage certain concepts are necessarily ‘fuzzy,’ as the
theory predicts they will be, but that very fuzziness allows speakers to use
language creatively. According to Hudson, prototype theory may even be applied
to the social situations in which speech occurs. He suggests that, when we hear
a new linguistic item, we associate with it who typically seems to use it and
what, apparently, is the typical occasion of its use. Again, we need very few
instances – even possibly just a single one – to be able to do this. Of course,
if the particular is atypical and we fail to recognize this fact, we could be
in for some discomfort at a later time when we treat it as typical.
Taboo and Euphemism
Taboo is the prohibition or
avoidance in any society of behavior believed to be harmful to its members in
that it would cause them anxiety, embarrassment, or shame. It is an extremely
strong politeness constraint. Consequently, so far as language is concerned,
certain things are not to be said or certain objects can be referred to only in
certain circumstances, for example, only by certain people, or through
deliberate circumlocutions, i.e., euphemistically. Of course, there are always
those who are prepared to break the taboos in an attempt to show their own
freedom from such social constraints or to expose the taboos as irrational and
unjustified, as in certain movements for ‘free speech.’ English also has its
taboos, and most people who speak English know what these are and observe the
‘rules.’ When someone breaks the rules, that rupture may arouse considerable
comment, although not perhaps quite as much today as formerly, as when Shaw’s
use of bloody in Pygmalion or the use of damn in the movie Gone with the Wind
aroused widespread public comment. Standards and norms change. Linguistic
taboos are also violated on occasion to draw attention to oneself, or to show
contempt, or to be aggressive or provocative, or to mock authority – or,
according to Freud, on occasion as a form of verbal seduction, e.g., ‘talking
dirty.’ The penalty for breaking a linguistic taboo can be severe, for
blasphemy and obscenity are still crimes in many jurisdictions, but it is
hardly likely to cost you your life, as the violation of certain non-linguistic
taboos, e.g., incest taboos, might in certain places in the world.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar